🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in February, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to remove the history of people of color and experience from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.