🔗 Share this article

A surprising connection on the professional network. An offer of employment from a headhunter, most likely a young woman, operating from China. The opportunity to make around £20,000 part-time writing a handful of geopolitical reports for a Chinese company peppered with “non-public” or “insider” insights. Payment in digital currency or physical money preferred.

It may seem clear, on this telling, that something about this approach would be amiss. Nevertheless, Beijing's influential Ministry of State Security continues to view it valuable to use recruitment consultants to try it – leading the domestic spy agency to warn repeatedly about their activity online.

Massive Contact Attempts on Social Media

Last year, the head of MI5 Ken McCallum stated Chinese agents were approaching Britons on LinkedIn on an extraordinary scale, at a rate of 10,000 over the previous 30-month period, seeking political, industrial, military and technological classified information. But a new campaign aimed at politicians and parliament has led the spy agency to take further action.

An espionage alert was issued on this week via the administrative teams of the Commons speaker and his House of Lords counterpart: a single slide after the repeated efforts of Shirly Shen and Amanda Qiu to reach out to MPs, lords, their staffers, economic experts, research organizations – anybody who might become a source.

Intelligence Strategy and Legislative Changes

In the typical style of British intelligence, there was no official release of the security advice from the agency or the Home Office. Yet the agency knew its advisory document would leak once it was sent electronically out to Westminster. Sharing it in the press helps the general population better identify interactions with a deceptive purpose.

This warning has the impact of uncovering additional details from within parliament, although that is not the agency's primary purpose. The agency aims for people in public life to understand that simply because exchanges on professional networks are less overtly risky as on X or Facebook, it does not mean they are completely safe.

Nor is domestic spy agency understood to have been responding to any specific incident in the legislature, although the burst of activity does come after the embarrassing failure of the prosecution of a ex-assistant an individual and his friend Christopher Berry on a legal detail earlier in the autumn.

The two had been accused of working for the foreign power – a allegation they rejected – but failure to complete a prosecution under the now repealed previous legislation resulted in concerns that the UK's political system had been insufficiently defended.

Revised Laws and China's Strategic Interests

The law has now been changed, and the MI5 slide contains a reminder of its replacement: “Individuals involved in spying operations risk significant criminal penalties under the National Security Act.” This constitutes a criminal offense if a person participates in conduct that could potentially “materially assist a foreign intelligence service”.

An obvious question, though, is what Beijing has to gain. A politician who is not a government minister will have limited access of sensitive information, and an contact of theirs less so. Yet the Chinese government is also interested in parliament: for a period, in 2020 and 2021, the Britain's China policy on issues such as Huawei or the human rights situation or alleged atrocities was being driven by MPs.

Cultural Differences and Persistent Digital Threats

In part there are cultural differences as well. Autocratic regimes like China’s utilize intelligence collection techniques and the size of its intelligence apparatus is enormous, engaging three hundred thousand people. Chris Inglis, a American cybersecurity head under president Joe Biden, said it was occasionally assessed that “China have more English speakers engaged in this than we [western intelligence] have personnel with language skills”.

Beijing is willing to cultivate contacts over the extended period and at times even the agencies have struggled to differentiate legitimate relationships and spying. “Beijing has a minimal requirement for what information is deemed to be useful,” security minister a government official told MPs on Wednesday, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may mean someone quickly peripheral becomes important.

An alternative perspective to think about the relentless activities at covert intelligence collection is in the broader framework of the geopolitical contest between China and the west at a level under the point of outright war. China has stepped up its hacking efforts, with the Salt Typhoon infiltration of communications systems in numerous nations, and the another operation compromise of millions internet devices.

Chinese authorities is engaged in relentless efforts to find covert sources on British democracy online because it seeks to be challenging, to demonstrate power and because it has the capability.